Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 12 results ...

Amirtash, P, Majid Parchami, J and Jelodar, M B (2021) Integration of project management services for International Engineering, Procurement and Construction projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), 330-49.

Bhattacharya, S, Momaya, K S and Iyer, K C (2021) Bridging the gaps for business growth among Indian construction companies. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), 231-50.

Cevikcan, E and Kose, Y (2021) Optimization of profitability and liquidity for residential projects under debt and equity financing. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), 369-91.

Isuri Anuradha, A, Soorige, D and Geekiyanage, D (2021) Comparative study on life cycle assessment of buildings in developed countries and Sri Lanka. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), 304-29.

Moyo, T, Crafford, G and Emuze, F (2021) People-centred management for improving construction workers' productivity in Zimbabwe. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), 350-68.

Ottou, J A, Baiden, B K, Nani, G and Martin Morgan, T (2021) Benefits of implementing Six Sigma in competitive tendering process. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), 214-30.

Safapour, E, Kermanshachi, S and Kamalirad, S (2021) Analysis of effective project-based communication components within primary stakeholders in construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), 157-73.

Sekar, G, Sambasivan, M and Viswanathan, K (2021) Does size of construction firms matter? Impact of project-factors and organization-factors on project performance. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), 174-94.

Sun, J, Balakrishnan, S and Zhang, Z (2021) A resource allocation framework for predisaster resilience management of interdependent infrastructure networks. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), 284-303.

Tuffaha, F M, Assaf, S, Yasar Zakaria, Z and Hadidi, L A (2021) A framework for the performance assessment of construction contractors in Saudi Arabia. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), 195-213.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: contractor performance; critical success factors; decision support system; performance assessment; user satisfaction; construction costs; principal components analysis; retrofitting; Saudi Arabia; UK; USA
  • ISBN/ISSN:
  • URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2020-0004
  • Abstract:
    In this work, a framework for assessing construction contractors' performance in Saudi Arabia is developed. Usually, a contractor's assessment is based on financial aspects, which are lagging indicators in nature, and can ignore other nonfinancial aspects. Hence, a more detailed contractors' assessment framework is needed for the construction industry in Saudi Arabia. A framework that integrates financial and nonfinancial aspects in one model will enable contractors to better benchmark their performance to the rest of Saudi Arabia's construction industry. Initially, the literature is reviewed and the most commonly used key performance indicators (KPIs) are identified and surveyed through contractors' feedback to ensure their proper alignment with Saudi Arabia's construction industry. The adopted set of KPIs will be further prioritized through the relative importance index (RII) method based on the surveyed contractors' perceptions. Furthermore, the important set of KPIs will be factored into various groups using principle component analysis (PCA). Finally, the findings are validated through expert judgment. All key performance indicators (KPIs) have proven to be significant, except for the environmental factor, which happens to be nonsignificant and hence has been omitted from further consideration. The remaining KPIs have been factored through the principle component analysis method. Five generic dimensions were identified: Performance, Satisfaction, Actual Metrics, Estimated Metrics and Compliance. The model has been validated by expert feedback, and it was found to be reliable. The proposed model establishes an assessment framework to aid building construction contractors in assessing their performance in real time, in addition to postconstruction assessment for business development and retrofitting purposes.

Verma, S, Mandal, S N, Robinson, S, Bajaj, D and Saxena, A (2021) Investment appraisal and financial benefits of corporate green buildings: a developing economy case study. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), 392-408.

Zarghami, S A and Gunawan, I (2021) The emergence and evolution of reliability theory for water distribution networks. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(2), 251-65.